Private Health Insurance
Dave Johnson was part of a group who had lunch with former Presidential candidate Michael Dukakis a couple of days ago. At one point he offered what I think is a great idea. He said that the country should let people buy into Medicare at cost today, while health care reform is worked out.
He said, "I've been thinking about the benefits of this idea. Medicare doesn't have to pay any CEOs hundreds of millions a year, or give million-dollar bonuses to management. Its overhead is microscopic compared to the overhead of private insurance companies, so their costs are much lower."
Companies that provide employees with insurance could immediately lower their costs dramatically. Just transfer all the employees over the the Medicare buy-in plan instead of the expensive private insurance company plans they now buy.
- Individuals who now buy their own insurance could immediately reduce their own costs.
- Some people who cannot afford health insurance today could afford to buy into Medicare.
- Every doctor's office already handles Medicare claims, so this would greatly reduce the current overhead costs of doctor's offices.
- This would bolster the Medicare program.
- People would get better health care because Medicare doesn't deny treatments to increase their own profits.
- People would actually be insured because Medicare doesn't look for reasons to cut off coverage when people get sick, like private insurance companies do.
In other related news
PRIVATE health insurance has shown a slight lift in memberships, defying speculation that easing government penalties on non-joiners would result in a health fund downturn.
In the last quarter of 2008, private health insurance membership grew by 54,000 people, or 0.1 percentage point.
A total of 44.8 per cent of all Australians were covered by private hospital insurance, the highest proportion of people covered for hospital treatment since December 2001.
This is the first release of membership figures for the period since the confirmation of Government changes which will lift from $50,000 to $70,000 the annual income a single person can earn before having to choose between taking out health insurance or paying a 1 per cent surcharge on the Medicare levy. For couples, the threshold rose from $100,000 to $140,000.
The Government said the changes would deliver tax cuts to 250,000 Australians. The changes do not take full effect until next financial year, although it had been expected that at least some people who could opt out of insurance beforehand would do so.
The figures released yesterday by the Private Health Insurance Administration Council show that membership has grown, even among the 25-29 age group who would normally be the most likely to drop insurance.
When thechanges were introduced last year, the Opposition and health insurers attacked it as a measure that would cut the number of insured people.
The Opposition's then health spokesman, Joe Hockey, said last May that membership, at that stage at 44.6 per cent of the population, would be a high point. He said because of the Government changes, there was "only one way the private health sector can go under the Rudd Government and that's down".
The Health Minister, Nicola Roxon said the modest growth was encouraging. "Given the economic circumstances, the Government will continue to closely monitor membership numbers over the coming months," she said.
The chief executive officer of the Australian Health Insurance Association, Dr Michael Armitage, said the result vindicated research that once members had used their health insurance and realised its value, "it remains one of their last discretionary spends, even in difficult economic times". It was vital that the Government stay committed to a strong private health sector.
The Opposition's health spokesman, Peter Dutton, stuck with the view that the increase in the Medicare surcharge threshold would reduce the number of Australians with private health insurance.
Hospital Care Suffering in Economy
The economic decline is continuing to ravage the nation's hospitals, with half of them operating in the red and many planning service and staffing cuts, two new reports show.
Hospitals are ailing because of a number of problems hitting in close succession. First, hospitals' investment incomes plummeted -- like everybody's -- eliminating a cushion for operating budgets and curtailing capital spending.
Then, the mix of patients began to shift: Paying admissions declined as people put off elective procedures and insurers tightened their grip on the length of hospital stays they covered. And the number of patients without insurance or the means to pay their part of the bill began to rise.
These problems have been surfacing for several months. But new data show their breadth and depth. Indeed, an unprecedented 50% of the nation's hospitals appear to be losing money, according to an analysis of government and proprietary data that Thomson Reuters is set to release today.
When the slide began, returns on investment were the primary culprit, according to Thomson's analysis of data on a cross-section of hospitals. Total margins for every type of hospital -- public, private, for-profit and nonprofit -- declined in 2008, the analysis found.
Hospital operating margins -- the extent to which operating income exceeds expenses -- remained fairly consistent through the third quarter of 2008. But nonoperating margins, composed primarily of investment income, started to fall in late 2007, and the decline accelerated in mid-2008.
"This dragged down the median total margin to near zero and left approximately 50% of hospitals in the red," the analysis concluded. "When we compare these total margin statistics with historic data, we find that medians this low have not been observed before."
The 25% of hospitals in the worst shape posted margins below -7%, or 7% worse than the break-even point, while the top performers' margins exceeded 4.5%.
Even operators of the most robust hospitals are bracing for another difficult year as the effects of layoffs and employer cuts in health insurance benefits take hold.
"We will see our charity care numbers go up as a result of the current economic situation, and we'll also see our bad debt go up and people who are unable to pay their bills," said Deborah A. Proctor, the chief executive of St. Joseph Health System, based in Orange.
The nonprofit system -- which runs 14 hospitals in California, New Mexico and Texas -- ended its last fiscal year with a healthy 4.8% margin. That will be a tough mark to achieve this year because of the anticipated increase in uninsured and underinsured patients, Proctor said.
"It will hit all hospitals," she said. "Those who are already in negative revenues will probably see that get worse as things go along."
Forty-four percent of hospitals have seen declines in surgeries, with hip procedures showing the steepest drop-off at 45%, according to another new survey. As a result, 47% of the hospitals surveyed expect to make staff cuts, and 69% plan to cancel or delay equipment purchases, according to the survey by Novation, a company that manages supplier contracts for hospitals.
Novation has responded by demanding that vendors maintain or roll back prices on the goods they sell to hospitals.
"We know that the weakened economy has hit hospitals particularly hard, and they are being forced to make some tough decisions," said Novation President Jody Hatcher. "In November, we took a bold 'no increase' pricing stance."
Proctor said the St. Joseph hospitals may have to delay building projects and equipment purchases. But she said she did not anticipate layoffs or service cuts.
"We have to operate more effectively and more efficiently" to meet the needs of the growing ranks of uninsured and underinsured, she said. "However, it will not keep us from providing in those situations. That's our mission. It's always been our mission to serve the least among us."
The foundation arm of St. Joseph was set to make a down payment on a healthier future this year. It had long planned to roll out a $3-million, three-year attack on childhood obesity in Orange County through medical screenings, as well as nutrition and exercise programs in schools.
Proctor said the organization proceeded with the effort in spite of the economic downturn in the belief that it would eventually pay dividends for the community.
"We did not in any way back away from this program," she said. "This was a key commitment for us."