About Jupiter Florida
The area where the town now sits was originally named for the Hobe indian tribe which lived at the mouth of the Loxahatchee River, and whose name is also preseved in the name of nearby Hobe Sound. A mapmaker misunderstood the Spanish spelling 'Jobe' of the Indian name 'Hobe' and recorded it as 'Jove'. Subsequent mapmakers further misunderstood this to be the Latin translation of the god Jupiter, and they anglicized the name from Jove to 'Jupiter.' The Roman god Jupiter (or Zeus in the Greek mythology) is the chief Roman god, husband of Juno, and god of light, of the sky and weather, and of the state and its welfare and its laws. Jupiter inspired a neighboring village to name itself "Juno Beach".
Insurance Help #032
HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
Surveying the health care landscape of the past few years, Carl Witkowski felt the sting of continued and costly insurance increases.
He also felt the winds blowing toward employee wellness.
Capitalizing on a movement toward personal responsibility, Witkowski carved out a program for his employer that financially rewards workers for making healthy life choices. Employees at Guard Insurance in Wilkes-Barre now get a break in the cost of their health insurance premiums for participating in voluntary programs geared toward better health.
The company, in turn, gets a break from the spiraling costs of coverage for about 350 employees.
.It.s about the bottom line for all of us,. said Witkowski, executive vice president of information systems and chief administrative officer. .This isn.t what.s good for big business or corporations. This is about what.s good for all of us, because it hits all of our pockets..
Wellness programs are becoming increasingly popular nationally and in Northeastern Pennsylvania as employers stare down the barrel of long-term health care costs. Workplace programs that focus on rewarding employees who make healthy lifestyle choices have the potential to save untold dollars for employers, who see their health insurance rates climb in part because of largely preventable health problems suffered by their workers.
Employers and some health care experts say the focus on workplace wellness lends itself to a healthier bottom line and a more productive work force.
.That doesn.t provide any immediate results, but from a long-term perspective, it makes a lot of sense. You.re going to see more and more of it,. said benefits consultant Roger G. Howell, president of Howell Benefit Services Inc. in Wilkes-Barre. .Any incentive program to improve the health of their work force will have a positive effect on productivity in the workplace..
Guard initiated its wellness program at the start of 2006. Just before then, the company doubled the amount of premium costs for employees, from 20 percent to 40 percent.
But workers can earn discounts on their premium costs by participating in wellness programs. For example, a health risk assessment shaves 4 percent off a worker.s share of premium cost, as does a wellness screening that examines weight, blood glucose and other factors. Nonsmokers automatically received a 4 percent reduction.
Workers who participated in the wellness program in 2006 paid only 19 percent in out-of-pocket health care costs . less than what they paid two years ago.
The program had a 95 percent participation rate.
The key lies in creating real economic incentives, along with finding a model that doesn.t penalize workers who choose to skip wellness altogether, Witkowski said.
.We.re not here to tell you how to live,. he said. .We made it clear we weren.t punishing anyone for having poor health, but we were going to reward individuals for engaging in behaviors that led to positive health..
History of Health Insurance
When Medicare and Medicaid - our government programs to provide health care for the elderly and the poor - were approved in 1965, they were widely seen as a step toward the universal health care that former President Harry Truman had unsuccessful advocated 20 years earlier. The United States was catching up with the rest of what was then called the industrialized world, in creating a more just and humane society.
Our leaders then escalated the Vietnam War and drained the funds necessary to expand health care, and as Martin Luther King, Jr. famously noted, for the war on poverty as well. In 1981 the "Reagan Rollback" began and the country embarked upon its project of building a bridge to the 19th century in areas of social policy.
One of the few bright spots over the last few decades in the struggle to extend health insurance coverage was the passage of the SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) in 1997. This program provided for federal grants to states that wanted to expand health care insurance to children. The children eligible would be those that did not qualify for Medicaid but lived in families with income below twice the poverty level. (The poverty level for a family of three today is $17,170 per year.)
More than 4 million children are enrolled in SCHIP, and most of them would not have health insurance without the program. About 90 percent of these children live in a family with a parent who works. This reflects a major purpose of the program: to help families whose main earner is working full time but still cannot afford health insurance for the children. For example, consider a worker with two children with income is between $1431 and $2862 a month before taxes. She is not eligible for Medicaid. Paying $800 a month to cover her children - even if she is lucky enough to have that option with employment-based insurance - may make it difficult to pay for rent, food, utilities and other necessities.
There are still about 9 million children uninsured in the United States, some of whom are eligible for SCHIP or Medicaid but are not enrolled. The Federal government currently funds SCHIP at about $5 billion a year - just 0.2 percent of the federal budget and less than one percent of all public health care spending. The program comes up for renewal in September of this year, and there will be debate over its funding.
A recent New York Times/CBS poll found 84 percent of Americans want the program expanded so that it covers all uninsured children. The public has it right - the program has been effective and universal coverage for children makes sense.
Of course, universal coverage for all Americans makes even more sense, and this also has majority support and is clawing its way back to the political agenda. The main obstacles are, as always, powerful special interests that corrupt our political system. Number one is the lobby for insurance companies, whose main goal is to insure the healthy and avoid the sick. The resources that they waste in this perverse pursuit help make our health care system the most expensive in the world: we spend about twice as much per person as other high-income countries. And we still end up with 47 million uninsured and worse health outcomes - lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality - than the other countries that provide universal heath insurance at half the cost.
This colossal inefficiency and waste will have to be fixed if any health care advances are to last. And that will undoubtedly mean that the public sector becomes the dominant insurer, as it is now for the elderly and disabled. But until then, expanding children's health coverage is an important step forward.